MEJEPA / VOL · I · № 02
VERDICT №0002 · CYBERSECURITY FOLIO
info@mejepa.com · CMMC · NIST 800-171
№ 02 — Folio for the Channel

Attackers test your code.
Auditors test your evidence.

For MSPs, MSSPs, vCISOs, and CMMC/NIST consultants: Mejepa hands you the auditor-ready packet for every AI-assisted ticket, policy draft, compliance memo, and client report — without ripping out your existing security stack.

5 days snapshot turnaround CMMC L2 + 800-171 mapping $1,500–$3,500 snapshot $1–5k/mo retainer (optional)
SNAPSHOT EXTRACT · CLIENT=ACME-MFG · 2026-05-09T11:14Z CMMC-MAPPED · OFFLINE-VERIFIABLE
Pass AI ticket triage · 14 alerts classified · 100% within validated envelope sig 0x9a3f…
Abstain Compliance summary draft · low confidence on §3.13.11 mapping · routed to human sig 0x4c08…
Fail M365 anomaly note · unsupported claim about user behavior · blocked from client report sig 0x7e21…
Pass CMMC AC.L2-3.1.1 evidence pack · 23 controls · signed for assessor handoff sig 0x1d77…
§1 THE NEW GAP IN YOUR STACK

Your clients are using AI. You're the one on the hook.

Copilot, ChatGPT, ticketing AI, AI-generated policies, AI-written compliance evidence, AI executive summaries, AI-assisted remediation notes. Your clients use them. You sign off on what comes out.

For two decades, the channel's product was liability defense. The audit landed. You handed the assessor a clean evidence packet. The client renewed. Your insurance carrier didn't call.

AI broke that. Your clients deployed Microsoft Copilot in finance. Their helpdesk runs an LLM that drafts replies and closes tickets unattended. Their compliance officer is generating SSP narratives in ChatGPT. None of it has a signed record. When the next CMMC assessor, NIST auditor, or cyber-insurance underwriter asks "how do you know the AI didn't invent, leak, or misstate something?" — most providers have nothing.

That is the burning problem. Not threats. Not malware. The absence of evidence under your signature for work that increasingly happens without you in the loop.

Mejepa is not an EDR, a SIEM, a CASB, a SASE, a DLP, or another GRC dashboard. It is the evidence service that produces signed, auditor-ready packets for AI-assisted security and compliance work — mapped to the controls your clients already care about, sitting beside the stack you already sell.

§2 THE OFFER

AI Compliance Evidence Snapshot. Five business days.

One client workflow. One signed packet. Mapped to the frameworks your assessor will name. Delivered before the next quarterly review.

One-time snapshot

$1,500–$3,500 / flat

Mejepa reviews one of your client's AI-assisted security or compliance workflows end-to-end. You receive an AI usage inventory, a workflow risk map, signed sample verification records on five real outputs, a list of recommended human-review gates, and a CMMC/NIST-mapped audit packet ready for assessor handoff.

5 business days Signed · ED25519

Evidence Retainer

$1,000–$5,000 / month

Continuous evidence production for AI-assisted work across your client base. Pricing scales with client count and verification volume. Includes quarterly assessor-ready exports, framework-mapping updates as CMMC/NIST/ISO standards evolve, and Slack/Teams access to the Mejepa reviewer pool.

Monthly cadence Includes co-marketing
01 · SCOPE

Pick one client workflow: ticket triage, policy drafting, SSP narrative writing, M365 anomaly review, compliance evidence summarization, vCISO advisory.

02 · SAMPLE

Provide 30 days of AI-assisted outputs (anonymized if needed) plus framework targets — CMMC 2.0 L1/L2, NIST SP 800-171, ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, etc.

03 · VERIFY

Mejepa runs the samples through 13 frozen instruments, classifies each output's verdict, maps to controls, and stages the assessor packet.

04 · DELIVER

Signed PDF + machine-verifiable JSON + control-by-control evidence file. You hand it to the client, the assessor, or the cyber-insurance underwriter.

§3 WHAT THIS IS NOT

The anti-grift section.

The channel has heard enough AI pitches. Here is what Mejepa is not, in writing, before the demo — so we don't waste your half hour.

NOT THIS
  • Another EDR or MDR
  • A SIEM, CASB, SASE, ZTNA, or DLP
  • A GRC dashboard with another login
  • A model wrapper that "filters bad outputs"
  • A chatbot you have to talk to
  • A platform that takes 6 months to deploy
THIS
  • A signed PDF + JSON your auditor verifies offline
  • Mapped to the controls your client already buys
  • Sits beside your existing stack — touches nothing
  • Built on independent Teleox.ai research, not vendor magic
  • No software for your client to install
  • First snapshot in 5 business days
There's no chatbot. There's no agent that "watches your environment." The output is a signed PDF your assessor can verify offline in thirty seconds with a published public key. That's the whole product.
§4 WHO USES THIS

The four channel-buyer archetypes. All four named here on purpose.

If you do not see yourself in one of these rows, this snapshot is not for you. We would rather you knew now.

MSPs · MSSPs

You sell managed IT or security.

Your clients use Copilot, ChatGPT, and ticketing AI without your evidence chain on top. The snapshot becomes a quarterly deliverable — and a new line item your competitors can't price-match.

vCISOs

You advise mid-market boards.

Your clients ask whether they can adopt AI safely. The signed packet is the answer you can put your name on without writing it from scratch every time.

CMMC & NIST CONSULTANTS

You take clients through Level 1 or Level 2.

Your assessor will ask how AI-assisted SSP narratives, evidence summaries, and remediation notes were verified. The snapshot is that answer, pre-built and pre-signed for handoff.

REGULATED SMB OPERATORS

You run security in-house.

Defense-industrial-base supplier, manufacturer with government contracts, regulated mid-market — you already pay for compliance theater. The snapshot is the part the theater is missing.

§5 THE PROOF

Why this holds up under audit.

Three primitives. The math is public. The signatures are verifiable. The chain is append-only. No hand-waving.

PRIMITIVE / 01

13 frozen instruments

Calibrated lenses that do not change between releases. Same AI output, same reading. The auditor's foundation.

PRIMITIVE / 02

Conformal guard

Statistical boundary with a published coverage rate. Outside the envelope, Mejepa abstains. The abstention is signed.

PRIMITIVE / 03

Witness chain

Ed25519-signed, append-only. Verifiable offline in thirty seconds. No vendor lock-in to read your own evidence.

Provenance · Built on Teleox.ai

Mejepa is the commercial productization of Teleox.ai — an independent research framework on meaning compression. The 13-instrument panel and ed25519 witness chain are open research primitives (Derived Data Abundance + Teleological Constellation Training), published and citable. The assessor can read the papers.

§6 WHAT WE PROMISE · WHAT WE'RE BUILDING

What ships today. What's on the roadmap.

The snapshot you book this quarter is built on shipping primitives. The vision below names where the wedge expands as MSPs, MSSPs, and CMMC consultants buy the next packet.

Today · The promise
  • Goodhart-immune Gτ guard — constellation centroids are frozen. The predictor cannot learn to fool its own guard. Adversarial patches are structurally blocked, not just empirically detected.
  • Per-session isolation — every AI edit captured with before/after SHA-256, session_id-keyed, with EditLock and agent-id rate limits. One daemon, many MSP clients, zero cross-contamination.
  • Two-person rule for catastrophic changesmejepa_promote_approval (SEC-005) maps directly to CMMC AC.L2-3.1.5 and NIST AC-5 separation-of-duties.
  • Single-node, operator-controlled hardware — no multi-tenant cloud, no SaaS attack surface. Private key never leaves the operator's box.
  • Published methodology — Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19977981. Hand the assessor the paper.
Tomorrow · The vision
  • ME-JEPA-Security domain pack — purpose-built embedders for SIEM, EDR, and ticketing-AI signal classes.
  • Continuous evidence stream — today: 5-day snapshot. Tomorrow: hourly attested log feed direct into your GRC platform.
  • NIST AI RMF baseline alignment — as federal AI evidence requirements harden, Mejepa packets pre-map to the framework regulators land on.
  • vCISO / GRC platform OEM — Mejepa as the AI Risk Verification module inside Cynomi, Drata, Compliance Scorecard.
Roadmap items are sold as direction, not delivered as features.
§7 FREQUENTLY ASKED

The channel asks. Mejepa answers.

How do MSPs prove their AI evidence to a CMMC assessor?

MSPs serving DoD contractors and regulated SMBs need a defensible record of how AI-assisted work — ticket triage, policy drafting, compliance summaries, AI-assisted remediation notes — was verified before reaching the client. Mejepa reviews one client AI-assisted workflow and returns a signed audit packet mapped directly to CMMC 2.0 Level 2 controls (AC, AU, CM, IR, RA, SC) and NIST SP 800-171 requirements. Delivered in 5 business days for $1,500–$3,500.

What is an AI Compliance Evidence Snapshot?

A productized 5-business-day Mejepa engagement that produces five artifacts for one MSP/vCISO client workflow: (1) AI usage inventory, (2) workflow risk map, (3) signed sample verification records for five real outputs, (4) recommended human-review gates, and (5) CMMC/NIST-mapped audit packet ready for assessor handoff. $1,500–$3,500 per snapshot, with an optional $1,000–$5,000/month retainer for continuous evidence.

Does Mejepa replace my EDR, SIEM, CASB, or SASE?

No. Mejepa is not an EDR, MDR, SIEM, CASB, SASE, ZTNA, or DLP. It is an AI evidence service that sits beside your existing security stack and answers a question those tools cannot: "how do you know the AI didn't invent, leak, or misstate something?" The Mejepa packet is what your CMMC assessor or cyber-insurance underwriter will ask for next.

How does Mejepa map to CMMC 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171?

The audit packet maps AI-workflow evidence to specific CMMC 2.0 controls — AC.L2-3.1.1 access control, AC.L2-3.1.5 separation of duties, AU.L2-3.3.1 audit logging, CM.L2-3.4.1 configuration management, RA.L2-3.11.1 risk assessment — and the corresponding NIST SP 800-171 r3 requirements. Mejepa's two-person rule (mejepa_promote_approval SEC-005) for catastrophic AI changes maps directly to CMMC AC.L2-3.1.5 and NIST AC-5.

How much does the Cybersecurity AI Evidence Snapshot cost?

$1,500–$3,500 flat per snapshot, delivered in 5 business days, covering one client AI-assisted workflow end-to-end. Optional monthly retainer: $1,000–$5,000/month, with pricing scaled by client count and verification volume. The retainer includes continuous evidence production, quarterly assessor-ready exports, framework-mapping updates as CMMC/NIST/ISO evolve, and Slack/Teams access to the Mejepa reviewer pool.

Can vCISO platforms OEM Mejepa as an AI Risk Verification module?

Yes. Mejepa offers an AI Risk Verification Module Pilot ($10K–$25K, 60-day) and Full OEM Licensing ($50K–$200K/year plus per-client or per-packet royalty) for vCISO and GRC platforms — Cynomi, Drata MSP, Cytracom/Tentacle, Compliance Scorecard. Includes integration spec, white-labeled API, co-branded packet format, and quarterly business review with roadmap input.

What does "Goodhart-immune Gτ guard" mean?

Mejepa's Gτ guard uses constellation centroids that are externally frozen — the learned predictor has no gradient path to those centroids and therefore cannot learn to fool its own guard (Goodhart's law immunity by construction). Adversarial patches and prompt-injection attacks engineered to slip past the verdict are structurally blocked, not just empirically detected. Methodology published in the Dynamic / ME-JEPA research paper (Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19977981).

§6 NEXT

One client. One workflow. Five days.

Pick a client whose AI usage worries you most. Mejepa returns a signed snapshot you can put under your own name at the next QBR — and a co-marketing plan if you want to land more snapshots after that.

CYBERSECURITY FOLIO · VOL · I · № 02 · info@mejepa.com